The average Australian has gone from working 37.5 hours a week in 2001 to 34.4 in 2023 — a drop of over 3 hours. My post last week broke down these trends at the population level.

On the surface, this looks like we're all embracing a better work-life balance. But is that what's really happening?

A drop in the average can be caused by two very different things:

1) A "within-person" trend: Individuals are genuinely reducing their hours over their careers, reflecting true change at a personal level.

2) A "compositional" shift: This is a "between-person" change, where the types of workers are actually changing. For example, older generations who worked long hours are retiring and being replaced by newer generations who (on average) work fewer hours.

So which is it? Are individuals genuinely working less or is the workforce just changing? We used a hierarchical Bayesian model on more than two decades of data from the HILDA survey to tease these two explanations apart.

Here's what the results show (shown in the figure below):

Working hours decomposition showing overall trend, compositional change, and within-person change

So the national average is going down because the types of jobs and workers are changing. But for the average individual, the workload is slowly creeping up. This is a classic Simpson's Paradox. The workforce as a whole works less, even if most of us individually are not.